Top StoryQuick CommercePlatforms● High Urgency
⊙ Entrackr, Inc42, Business Standard · Jul 22, 2026Confirmed
Blinkit turns adjusted-EBITDA positive for the first time, but inventory spoilage costs Eternal nearly three times that profit
Fact
Eternal (Zomato and Blinkit’s parent) reported Q1 FY27 consolidated revenue of ₹20,211 Cr, up 182% YoY from ₹7,167 Cr, and net profit of ₹92 Cr, up 268% YoY from ₹25 Cr a year earlier, though down 47% sequentially from ₹174 Cr in Q4 FY26, per Entrackr, Inc42 and Business Standard. Blinkit turned adjusted-EBITDA positive for the first time, posting ₹102 Cr on revenue of ₹15,664 Cr (up 552% YoY, now 77.5% of Eternal’s operating revenue) and 200 new dark stores added in the quarter. Per Eternal’s own shareholder letter, Blinkit lost roughly ₹308 Cr to expired food, damaged goods and theft this quarter, about 1.8% of its ₹17,132 Cr net order value, nearly three times the adjusted EBITDA that survived it. Founder Deepinder Goyal said Eternal remains willing to spend margin to grow “without hesitation,” and that competitor traction has come largely from lower prices.
Interpretation
Two numbers here work against each other if you only read the headline. Blinkit hitting adjusted-EBITDA profitability for the first time is what most coverage led with, but it’s a profit that inventory spoilage alone outweighs three to one, meaning the operating discipline behind quick commerce unit economics is still shakier than the profit line suggests. The sequential 47% profit decline on top of a 268% YoY gain echoes the exact pattern BlueStone posted this week, strong demand, thin and volatile bottom line. And Goyal’s own comments cut against the discounting-wars-are-ending framing some coverage led with, he is explicitly saying Eternal will keep spending margin to grow if it needs to, which reads like discounting pressure is still live, not resolved.
Action
D2C brands with SKUs stocked in Blinkit dark stores, especially in categories with shelf life such as fresh food, dairy and skincare with expiry dates, should ask their Blinkit category managers directly what share of that ₹308 Cr spoilage figure sits on brand-funded inventory versus Blinkit-owned stock, platforms squeezed on margin have historically pushed spoilage costs back onto supplier terms through listing fees or stricter minimum order quantities. If you are benchmarking quick-commerce distribution economics for a board deck, do not cite Blinkit as EBITDA positive without the spoilage caveat, investors doing basic diligence will ask about it.
Watch Next
Whether Blinkit’s inventory spoilage rate improves next quarter as a share of net order value, whether Zepto and Instamart’s upcoming results show comparable spoilage-to-profit ratios, and whether Goyal’s margin-to-grow comment translates into renewed discount-funding pressure on brand partners.